Text size
  • Small
  • Medium
  • Large
Contrast
  • Standard
  • Blue text on blue
  • High contrast (Yellow text on black)
  • Blue text on beige

Work Smarter, Not Harder

Technology is supposed to make our working lives easier, yet we spend longer at our desks than ever before, and we find ourselves working weekends and late nights as well. What happened to the dream of remote office working, and why do we still drag ourselves to and from the office everyday?



Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) have been around now for a long time, as has Citrix via a web browser, with several other vendors also having web based secure desktop solutions and laptops when bought in bulk are no more expensive than a standard business desktop. All this should mean that unless your role requires you to meet face to face with other people on daily basis, you should be able to do that majority of your workload from the comfort of your home. We spend most of our working day conversing via email or business instant messaging, so it should not matter if the person you are exchanging information with is on the next or 20 miles away. Presentations can be easily handled via one of the many ‘online meeting’ solutions and with most corporate office workers having fast broadband, accessing documents can be as fast as if they were inside your companies main building.



So with all this, you’d think that the trains (and tubes if you work in London) would empty, and companies would be mothballing the floors in their large buildings and saving money in the process. However the trains are still packed and the office buildings fully lit. Why is that?



In short, although technology has provided the gateway to remote working, most senior managers are reluctant to embrace it. They worry that the workers won't work as hard or even at all. A lot of managers operate in a command and control mindset, and feel that they have to be surrounded by their underlings to feel any amount of self-worth. In most major corporations presenteeism is rife - if you can’t be seen to be working; then you most definitely aren't.



This logic is flawed; all employees are subject to regular performance reviews and a slack worker will be a slack worker whether they are in the office or not. It is just as easy to stand around the water cooler all day gossiping as it is to sit watching television with only one eye on your inbox. If someone underperforms then appropriate action can still be taken.



That said, working from home is not for everyone. It does take a certain amount of discipline - it's very easy to procrastinate around the house and completely waste the day. Conversely, some people just don't know when to log off, and will quite merrily still be sitting at their laptops at 3am wondering why their urgent email to the rest of the team hasn't garnered an instant response.



Technology was supposed to release us from the daily nine to five grind, but all it has done is make us work harder and longer for our pay cheque. As office technology evolves will we just increase our effort and productivity to match?



Maybe disconnecting from the office environment isn't the only answer. A lot of us work on a laptop on daily basis, yet we sit at a desk to use it, defeating the option of mobility the device grants us. With the advent of cheap wireless access points your office could be kitted out with secure Wi-Fi fairly easily. Combine that with large soft areas consisting of low tables and comfortable seating and you will have created a relaxed working environment that promotes communal working, free thinking and open discussion.



Footnote



A few months ago I took up a new contract in an office building that was located in an area of the city I had hitherto never worked in. This area is very commercial but has only been in existence as a financial region for about 20 years. What shocked me was that the actual office was completely sterile with rows and rows of straight desks with no storage, and banks of small lockers for your 'stuff'. I am told that this style of open plan is common in this district but for me it merely emphasises how IT has chained us to our desks, instead of being the release mechanism.



Furthering my exploration of Twitter, I have read that over 40% of new Twitter users abandon the service after one month, and I can see why. Twitter is not a communications medium, it is a broadcast medium. This is something the businesses have worked out and are leveraging to great effect, but individual users have yet to cotton onto. From a personal point of view it seems to me that everyone on Twitter is talking, but no-one on Twitter is actually listening.

Comments (8)

Leave Comment
  • 1
    ChrisW wrote on 11th Jun 2009

    I've often wondered the same thing. But then I realised I was thinking too small. The dream of mobility has been realised, not by allowing us to work anywhere, but by shipping "our" work overseas and leaving many of us with all the time in the world and no work (or income) at all. Your "mobile" workers are simply chained to their own desks in Bangalore.

    Report Comment

  • 2
    Alex R wrote on 12th Jun 2009

    I agree Twitter from my usage is a broadcast medium and I use the links of those I follow where applicable: This also apply to lots of company twitters, I simply ignore most of the just noise like Oh I have a hangover this morning, last night must have been good: ................................................... Also that fact that so many remain on Twitter is a better guide to its success rather than the number leaving a guide to it failure as the number on Twitter is overall going up:

    Report Comment

  • 3
    Peter Parslow wrote on 12th Jun 2009

    Your headline is one of those phrases that gets my goat, as it were. Too often I've had it pushed down from on high - when a lot of our (developer) time is wasted because leadership changes direction (or at least priorities) part way through. 20 years after graduating in software development, five of us sat down & tried to list the software we'd developed which had actually gone into productive use. It was a short list. Of course, with innovation we expect to find a lot of 'wrong ways to make a light bulb', but it does seem too many. On the actual issues you discuss - I work at home 40% of the time, and my current employer is planning to relocated to much smaller premises, with varied & interesting furniture.

    Report Comment

  • 4
    ChrisW wrote on 12th Jun 2009

    Twitter is clearly beyond me. I signed up last week to follow a ...er... tweet(?) from a recruitment agency. I have never tweeted? twittered? and have no intention of doing so. Yet apparently there are now several people following me on Twitter (I'm starting to get Life Of Brian flashbacks...). This may be some kind of weird flocking behaviour, but hardly counts as communication. And they must be getting pretty bored by now.

    Report Comment

  • 5
    Alex R wrote on 12th Jun 2009

    Chris: You have spotted a few trends: ....................... Lots of people use twitter to follow a specific topic or other and rarely comment themselves unless directly to another twitter: Other Twitter to publish links that people may be interested in (I follow a few of these) and they provide a great service ........................ When people start following someone they typically will only stop following them if not interest in the noise they create, so if no noise or very little (which can be missed) people tend to leave the following even if nothing ever seen from that person: .............................. Plus some people just like to feel important, so follow lots of people to get them to follow themselves as a lot think if they are following me why not follow them, how can anyone really follow more than a few people on twitter and certainly where in the hundreds or thousands it would mean missing the important and just ignoring everything as noise: These people on twitter appear to be like sheep and play follow my leader via the web. ..................................... I follow very few (under 20) and seem to be picking up more follows (over 60) who I don' know and don' know why they want to follow me, plus the 20 I follow (and I do know most):

    Report Comment

  • 6
    Nigel B wrote on 15th Jun 2009

    Babies, bathwater, etc - in defence of the desk! Quote: "A lot of us work on a laptop on daily basis, yet we sit at a desk to use it, defeating the option of mobility the device grants us.... Combine that with large soft areas consisting of low tables and comfortable seating..." Soft seating and low tables are great for real conversation - you know, the old-fashioned sort where two people exchange news, opinions, etc without any form of mediating technology like Instant Massaging or Tw*tter - but not for computer use, unless it's a handheld. Have you ever tried using a laptop on a low table? It's wholly unnatural, crouching and bending the back, and no doubt a Health & Safety nightmare. Likewise, sitting on/in a low soft chair and using a laptop actually on your lap can bring a warm glow to the thighs. I wholly support the sort of communal relaxed areas you describe, and have designed office layouts which have made these a major feature, but would not encourage their use for laptop work. For anything other than a short burst of laptop activity, you need a chair which supports your back in a vertical position and a table at the right height for your forearms to be horizontal when pounding the keys. This doesn't have to be in an office of course, Starbucks et al usually have fine "workstations". Note to Editor: I'm not sure of your product placement policy, so you may wish to replace Starbucks with "a leading global Seattle-based coffee shop chain" ...

    Report Comment

  • 7
    MikeK wrote on 23rd Jun 2009

    I think the work smarter, not harder, is symptom of the type of personality often found in IT that rates finding the successful solution to a business or IT problem much higher and more attractive than a task that will provide a great deal of social interaction or one that will enhance status. It is not so long ago that no manager would have a computer terminal anywhere near their desk as it meant they not a high-status manager but a promoted techie. It is interesting in many businesses that those who need a quiet, undisturbed, area to think hard and concentrate (eg programmers) are usually housed in open plan areas, while those who need to communicate (managers) shut themselves away in offices. It is also interesting, in a public sector employer, how many users of Outlook's 'Plan a meeting' subsystem abandoned it for a paper diary when they got promoted and had access to a secretary. Then they could say in meetings "please contact my secretary to set up future meetings". The secretaries just wished they could use Outlook as they hated ringing around suggesting times. Most organisations could probably improve productivity greatly with a few small and easy to implement changes, but status and a chance for a chat outweighs the benefits.

    Report Comment

  • 8
    R S Athurupana wrote on 15th Sep 2009

    Working from home sounds good if its possible to work on a routine and not get disturbed. It has a feeling of uncertainity rather than working among people at an office and maybe discourage someone of doing so and also risks of not being successful in a particular job as expected or losing your job.

    Report Comment

Post a comment

Search this blog

February 2010
M
T
W
T
F
S
S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28