The UK has a rare chance to shape a new AI profession from the ground up, but only if it tackles the deep inequalities that still hold women back in tech. Grant Powell MBCS reports.
Summary:
- Only 22% of the UK’s tech workforce are women, a figure that has barely improved in the last decade
- A lack of diversity in the teams developing and governing AI risks causing inequality to become embedded, resulting in biased systems not fit for purpose
- We have an opportunity to build inclusion into our image of what the AI profession looks like from the beginning, addressing issues including the gender pay gap and recruitment practices
- Trustworthy, inclusive technology cannot be built on foundations that exclude half the population — the UK can build an AI profession that reflects its diverse, creative society
As the UK seeks to build a professional framework for AI which is rooted in ethics, transparency, and competence, an urgent question is raised: who will be empowered to build this future?
A report from BCS, with input from BCS Women and Coding Black Females, highlights that despite a decade of attention to the issue, women make up just one in five IT specialists in the UK. That figure has barely shifted, even as demand for digital and AI skills has surged. The message is clear: the pipeline is leaking, progress is too slow and the nation risks embedding bias and inequality into the very systems that look set to shape how we work, learn, travel, communicate and receive public services.
The report argues that diversity isn't a cosmetic concern — it is fundamental to producing AI that works for everyone. When the teams designing and governing AI do not reflect the society they serve, the risks of blind spots, biased systems and inequitable outcomes multiply. Conversely, diverse teams innovate faster, solve problems more effectively and build technologies that stand up better under scrutiny.
As the UK contemplates what a professionalised AI workforce should look like, this moment represents a rare opportunity to build inclusion in from the start, rather than attempting to retrofit it later.
The cost of underrepresentation
For girls and young women looking at the tech sector today, the message they receive remains mixed at best. On the one hand, the demand for digital skills has never been greater. On the other, the culture, visibility gap, and structural obstacles remain deeply entrenched.
When women make up only 22% of the tech workforce, the consequences ripple far beyond fairness. The UK loses out on talent, creativity and insight. It limits the breadth of ideas feeding its most transformative technologies. It narrows the perspectives shaping AI systems that will soon influence every aspect of daily life, from medical diagnosis to policing to education.
Key recommendations for building an inclusive AI profession
The underrepresentation of women in tech is not a pipeline problem alone; it is the result of systemic barriers that compound at every stage, from early education to boardroom selection. Tackling it requires coordinated action, persistent focus and leadership that refuses to tolerate stagnation.
BCS’ Gender Diversity in the Tech Sector Report 2025 sets out clear steps to make that happen:
Start early — strengthen STEM diversity from the classroom up
The report emphasises that early intervention is essential. The reform of the computing GCSE — announced in late 2025 and designed to be more future-focused with greater emphasis on AI —presents a valuable opportunity to attract and retain girls beyond the age of 14. But curriculum change alone is not enough.
For you
Be part of something bigger, join BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT.
Teachers need training and ongoing support to understand unconscious bias, to confidently teach both foundational and emerging technologies, and to encourage girls to see themselves as future technologists. Representation in teaching resources, exposure to role models, and inclusive classroom practices all play a role in shaping the choices young women feel empowered to make. Build confidence early, and the talent pipeline strengthens from the start.
Close the gender pay gap and create pathways to leadership
A persistent gender pay gap of around 12% in tech specialist roles signals another major issue: women are underrepresented in roles that attract pay premiums, especially senior technical and leadership positions. To address this, companies must move beyond generic ‘women in tech’ initiatives and implement structural change. This includes:
- transparent pay and promotion frameworks
- sponsorship programmes that connect women with senior advocates
- leadership training tailored to support progression
- clear, well signposted pathways into advanced technical roles
Retention is as important as recruitment. Without visible opportunities to progress, talented women leave tech, often permanently. Industry must not only open the door, but ensure women can rise.
Address the specific barriers faced by black women in tech
The report is unequivocal: black women face unique and often overlooked challenges within the sector. These include isolation, limited access to networks of influence, under-recognition of expertise, and high drop off rates. Targeted interventions are essential. These include:
- mentorship schemes pairing black women with industry leaders
- leadership and skills training
- funded localised programmes such as the Birmingham Legacy Centre of Excellence
- platforms that amplify black women’s achievements and expertise
One-size-fits-all approaches to diversity can risk reinforcing inequalities rather than reducing them
Embed fairness into recruitment and career progression
Recruitment, promotion and professional development should never depend solely on individual managers or informal processes. Instead, they must be guided by transparent standards and independent, industry wide frameworks.
The report urges employers to adopt established professional standards such as:
- SFIA (Skills for the Information Age) — providing a common language for skills and competence
- CITP (Chartered IT Professional) — offering clear, accountable benchmarks for professional recognition
Professionalisation builds trust, both within organisations and across the sector. It helps ensure that decision making about careers is fair, consistent and based on proven competence.
An AI profession worthy of public confidence must rest on transparent, inclusive foundations.
Fix work-life balance and transform workplace culture
For many women, especially those with caregiving responsibilities, rigid work patterns remain a major barrier to progress. The report calls for:
- flexible working by default
- increased part time opportunities across all seniority levels
- policies that support carers rather than penalise them
But flexibility alone won’t change culture. The report stresses the need to challenge ‘tech bro’ environments — spaces where women feel excluded, marginalised or unheard. Psychological safety, inclusive meeting practices and zero tolerance approaches to discriminatory behaviour must become the norm. Inclusion is not an HR policy, it is a cultural shift.
A defining moment for the UK
The UK stands at a pivotal moment. As AI evolves, so too does the need for a recognised profession that combines technical excellence with ethics, responsibility and inclusion. Creating that profession from scratch means we can design it deliberately, not inherit outdated norms. But doing so requires urgency. Every year the gender imbalance persists, the UK loses talent, innovation capacity and global competitiveness. More importantly, it risks creating AI systems shaped by to narrow a set of experiences.
If AI is to serve everyone fairly, then everyone must have a voice in shaping it. The report’s message is both a warning and a call to action: we cannot build trustworthy, inclusive technology on foundations that exclude half the population. With decisive leadership, from classrooms to boardrooms, the UK can build an AI profession that reflects the diversity, creativity and brilliance of the society it serves.
Read the report and recommendations in full.
Take it further
Interested in this and similar topics? Explore BCS' books and courses: